Buat kak Wiwin dan yang lainnya, bisa baca di sini.

:O Ded kamu jantan sekali ............
kalo saya baca reviewnya sih masalah di camera ini ada di purple fringing deh sama noisenya lumayan tinggi. Mendingan Minolta A1 sih IMHO. tapi kan bacanya di dpreview... banyak canon troll disana, busyet .... :D

Ing....jangan bilang " jantan " , itu panggilan untuk hewan...[-x

:)).....kalau bukan jantan yah pejantan! :)) Kak D. anda cantik sekaleee! :)

Thanks berat infonya Mr. D.S Vai...kapan ngajarin gue main gitar nih??..:p...salam buat rekan2 Soneta Group yah...:))

:O Om Setiadi!!! Kalau saya homo mungkin sudah dikeceng deh :))
Untungnya saya normal, masih suka wanita dan disukai oleh para wanita B-)

:)) gua nga bilang jantan deh, tapi asli elo seksot bo ! :)), nga nyangka mannnnnnnn LOL.

Ada Jeruk minum Jeruk nih..:-s

Itu serius fotonya om setia??? :O masa sih????
Jauh banget dari bayanganku ya.... :|

Bibirnya tipis banget, pasti karena sering "dipake" jadi tipis :D
Thank you link-nya.

Sekarang bayangannya berubah.....
kayaknya cocok sebagai pemeran.....

ngomong2 Sony DSC F828 sudah beredar di Jakarta..? memasng menurut teman saya bilang ada problem noise nya type sony ini..

Sony DSC-F828 Review dari Luminous-Landscape

Contoh Potrait dengan Sony F828

Berikut cuplikan dari Review Michael Reichmann di Luminouse Landscape

I should point out, for the benefit of those that see noise in the ISO 64 and ISO 100 F828 frames, that to the extent that it's visible in 100% on-screen enlargements, it's invisible in A3 or Super A3/B sized prints. The same applies to very small amounts of colour fringing. These just can't be seen in real world photographic prints.

Unfortunately there are some folks who see a bit of noise texture in a 100% crop and somehow jump to the conclusion that the image is crap. It shouldn't be necessary to point this out, but if the entire image were shown it would be equivalent to an on-screen image almost 3 feet high by 4 feet wide. Of course you're going to see some noise and other artifacts. But the important thing to keep in mind is how does it look in a typical sized print — say up to 11X17" image size on paper? (Look at 42" Plasma HD TV from 6 inches away and you'll see dots. Watch the football game from 9 feet away and you'll enjoy the show).

The answer is, as I've stated several times in the above review — at ISO 64, and to a slightly lower extent ISO 100 — noise levels on prints are excellent. Almost indistinguishable from images shot with a Canon 10D. Does it matter that on-screen, at actual-pixel magnification, there are more flaws on the Sony image that in the 10D image? Not one bit. If it can't be seen on a print it's relevance to the creative artist is essentially non-existant. To what some have called the "pixel-paparazzi" though, it is a call to arms. So be it. But readers who chance upon these on-line discussions (and the Sony Forum on DP Review is a hornet's nest) should take a pause after reading some of the vitriol.

Long-time readers will recall that there was a similar hubbub three years ago when I published the first review of the Canon D30, claiming that on modest sized prints it surpassed 35mm scanned film. "No way", cried the film faithful. But, within a year though there was almost universal agreement that the low noise of Canon's first DSLR was a major factor in its imaging capabilities, regardless of pixel count.

Then, just a bit over a year ago I published the first review of the 11 MP Canon 1Ds and found that it surpassed medium format scanned film. Again there was an outcry. "How can this be"? Yet, it wasn't more than a few months later that mainstream magazines around the world and countless pro photographers agreed that indeed images from the Canon 1Ds were the equal if not superior to scanned medium format film.

So, now I make the claim that on prints up to 11X17" the Sony F828 produces images that are the equal of those from a 6MP DSLR and a high quality zoom lens. Disagree? Go do the test for yourself if you can. Do an honest appraisal of well-shot, well-printed images. When you do, if your findings are different than mine — fine. Let me know and we can discuss it. But the rabid "Oh no, it can't be" Cassandras should, in the meantime, make the test for themselves rather than spouting their diatribes based on the way they think things should be, rather than on empirical tests.

Melihat contoh gambar2 di review tsb, dan juga di www.dcresource.com, memang terlihat bahwa noise-nya cukup tinggi even pada ISO100. Juga, CA-nya terlihat jelas sekali, mengecewakan untuk lensa Carl-Zeiss. Pendapat pribadi saya, kamera seharga ini seharusnya bisa dibandingkan dengan 300D (atau mungkin dengan 10D dan D100) - tapi kenyataan mengatakan lain. I'm afraid I disagree with Michael Reichmann; sekali lagi, ini pendapat pribadi, take no offense.

Saya agree sama mas Andreas soal CA and noise tinggi. tapi kalo mao di bandingan sama 300d yang sensornya lebih gede yah kelasnya laen lah mas Andreas, apalagi sama 10d kalo kaga d100 yang lebih atas lagi kelasnya. kalo 300d di kasih lensa yang kurang lebih 125 mm f2.8 ( kalo di kali 1.6 jadi 200 mm) pasti harganya lebih mahal lah jatoh2nya, bener nga?
300d kan entry level DSLR, kalo 828 kan kelas prosumer camera. IMHO , Saya bilang lebih fair kalo di bandingan sama minolta A1 yang Prosumer juga. 828 sama A1 kan sama sama fixed lens jadi lebih fair aja :)

Personally saya lebih pilih hasil dari camera SONY f717 sih dibanding 828.

Terima kasih Kak Setiadi,...kamera ini sudah ada di Jakarta, tapi harus order dulu ... mengenai review sudah saya baca dan memang 2 hal itu yang tampak sekali, Noise dan Deep Purplenya Ian Gillan :p :)

Dulu saya berpikir ke kamera ini hanya kepraktisan saja, 28-200, sangat fleksibel sekali dibandingkan mainannya Iing yg harus beli lensa ini itu dan budgetnya juga harus besar ....

Saya akan review lagi kamera yg timbul di 2004, lagi nunggu juga buat d70 .....sekali lagi terima kasih

Kali ini saya mesti komentar soal foto diri Setiadi, terlalu gak tahan. Eh Setiadi, tahu diri dong. Gile 180 derajat bedanya, geli banget tahu....... :) :)

Klik disini untuk melihat contoh Foto Action menggunakan F828, dari DPreview SonyTalk Forum, Sangat menarik

klik pada gambar untuk memperbesar frame gambar.

Buat member yg sudah pro, mohon petunjuk bagaimana cara mengambil gambar action tersebut ? kok bisa sangat fokus dan tajam pada objeknya.

itu bukan action Fadil, itu namanya panning. coba kamu cari anggota yang namanya Linda P, ibu itu jagonya panning.

kalo saya moto kaya gitu set rendah aja speednya kaya 1/20, 1/30 terus ikutin object and pencet sambil di ikutin terus objectnya. nih ada contohnya, saya pake di Tv, set ke 1/20 jadinya kaya gini

Willy : :)

Ing, very nice shoot !!

D setiadi: itu foto ikang fauzi bukan sih ? :))

Will elo ada dendam pribadi sama Dsetiadi yah? kayanya sinis bener :D

Iing : itu Marissa Hague....:))

Iing : baru tau ya? ;)

Belum tahu keajaiban Sony DSC-F828? Bisa memperbaiki kualitas foto secara otomatis. Obyek yang biasa saja bisa jadi luar biasa! Foto kak D. Setiadi itu buktinya :D

kali mas Willy bukan sinis...kali itu cara mas Willy bercanda...who knows :p

Mas Jay...foto lama dikemanain...?

Setiadi ngak marah kahn.... sungguh saya tidak tahu siapa itu. Sapa sih? kuper neh.

ing gue mah dendem sama Setiadi udah dari sejak ngeliat nick dia pertama kali, pokoknya kesannya pengen nyentil terus.....

Jessica, how lovely you are, very understanding. I like you!

Tambahan: Setiadi curang, komentarnya diedit!!!! wek!